Senior Congress leader and former Maharashtra Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan has refused to apologise for his remarks on Operation Sindoor, saying that questioning military actions is a constitutional right and an essential part of democracy.
Speaking to reporters in Pune, Chavan maintained that his comments were based on his understanding of events during the initial phase of the operation. He argued that raising questions should not be equated with being anti-national.
“Why should I apologise? The Constitution gives me the right to ask questions,” Chavan said, standing firm despite mounting criticism.
What Did Chavan Say?
The controversy erupted after Chavan stated that India was “completely defeated” on the first day of Operation Sindoor, referring to an aerial engagement during the operation. He claimed that Indian aircraft were grounded following the initial exchange and alleged that the operation largely involved air and missile strikes without significant ground movement.
Chavan added that future wars may follow similar patterns and questioned whether such situations require maintaining a large standing army, remarks that further intensified the political backlash.
BJP Responds Sharply
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) reacted strongly, accusing the Congress of repeatedly undermining the Indian Armed Forces.
BJP spokesperson Shehzad Poonawalla described Chavan’s statements as “shocking” and claimed they echoed sentiments that weaken national morale. He alleged that such remarks reflect a broader mindset within the Congress leadership.
Union Minister Giriraj Singh also criticised Chavan, stating that no individual has the right to disrespect the courage and sacrifice of the armed forces. He added that insulting the military has become a recurring pattern in opposition politics.
Background of Operation Sindoor
Operation Sindoor was launched by India on May 7, targeting terror infrastructure across the border in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). The operation followed a deadly terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, in which 26 civilians were killed.
The operation was widely projected by the government as a strong response to terrorism, making any criticism around it politically sensitive.
Debate Over Free Speech vs National Sentiment
While Chavan’s remarks have drawn condemnation, some political observers note that the episode has reopened debate on the balance between free speech, accountability, and national security discourse.
Public reaction remains divided, with strong criticism from ruling party supporters and calls from others to protect the right to question government actions in a democracy.
