Law & Justice

Self‑Represented Homeowner Secures Pond Maintenance Order and Loan Disclosure in Delaware Court

By

Self‑Represented Homeowner Secures Pond Maintenance Order and Loan Disclosure in Delaware Court

Gwendolyn Colston, a homeowner in The Greens at Wyoming community in Delaware, represented herself in a lawsuit against the community’s homeowners association and developer. On October 5, 2026, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued an order in Colston v. The Greens at Wyoming Homeowners Association, Inc. The developer failed to appear or defend the case, resulting in a partial default judgment. The court ordered the developer to address maintenance of the community’s ponds and drainage ditches, citing Delaware environmental provisions that allow injunctive relief but not monetary damages. Colston also sought information about a $44,329.59 loan she alleged was connected to the HOA. The court required the developer to confirm whether it had taken out such a loan and to provide related documents. However, the court rejected Colston’s broader books‑and‑records claim, finding it directed against the wrong party and not meeting Delaware law requirements. The ruling gives Colston court‑ordered relief for pond and ditch maintenance and disclosure of the alleged loan, but it does not grant all of her requested remedies. The decision illustrates the limits of a default judgment and shows that a self‑represented homeowner can obtain specific injunctive relief even when other claims are denied.

Frequently asked questions

What did the Delaware Court of Chancery order in the case of Colston v. The Greens at Wyoming Homeowners Association, Inc.?

The court ordered the developer to address maintenance of the community’s ponds and drainage ditches and to confirm and provide documents regarding a $44,329.59 loan alleged to be connected to the HOA.

Why was Gwendolyn Colston’s books‑and‑records claim rejected?

The court found the claim directed against the wrong party and did not meet Delaware law requirements.

What does the ruling illustrate about default judgments and self‑represented homeowners?

It shows that a default judgment can provide specific injunctive relief even when other claims are denied, and that a self‑represented homeowner can obtain such relief.

Related stories