Law & Justice

Florida Appeals Court Orders New Trial After Elderly Homeowner’s Wheelchair Accident Prevented His Participation

By

Florida Appeals Court Orders New Trial After Elderly Homeowner’s Wheelchair Accident Prevented His Participation

A Florida homeowner who was fighting an insurance dispute had to undergo surgery after his wheelchair tipped over in a courthouse parking lot, preventing him from attending his own trial. The trial proceeded without him and the jury found against him. On September 25, a Florida Second District Court of Appeal overturned that verdict, ruling that the trial court erred by allowing the case to continue after the homeowner was seriously injured. The appeals court held that denying the homeowner the right to be present and participate in his own trial was a fundamental error and remanded the case for a new trial.

The dispute began in 2019 when the homeowner’s cast‑iron plumbing system failed, causing sewage and water damage throughout the house. He filed a claim with Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company for removal and replacement of damaged sections of the property. The insurer denied part of the claim, and the homeowner sued. The first jury held that the losses were excluded under the policy.

The appeals decision also addressed the insurer’s use of a neglect exclusion, which requires the policyholder to take reasonable steps to protect the property at and after a loss. Universal argued that a prior plumbing backup in 2016 or 2017 made the exclusion applicable because the homeowner had only replaced toilets, not performed more extensive repairs. A concurring judge questioned this interpretation, noting that the exclusion applies to acts during or after a loss, not to failures before it, and warned that accepting the insurer’s view could compel homeowners to replace entire plumbing systems after minor incidents.

The new trial will revisit the coverage dispute, and the ruling may influence how Florida property insurers evaluate past maintenance issues when deciding on future claims.

Frequently asked questions

Why did the Florida Second District Court of Appeal order a new trial?

The trial court erred by allowing the case to continue after the homeowner was seriously injured, denying him the right to be present and participate, which was a fundamental error.

What was the insurer's argument regarding the neglect exclusion?

Universal argued that a prior plumbing backup in 2016 or 2017 made the exclusion applicable because the homeowner had only replaced toilets, not performed more extensive repairs.

What will the new trial address?

The new trial will revisit the coverage dispute over the homeowner’s claim for removal and replacement of damaged plumbing sections and may influence how Florida property insurers evaluate past maintenance issues.

Related stories